Laxmipriya Biswal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax,Bhubaneswar
Held
The Court held that the petitioner's case was covered by the precedent set in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises. The Court noted the petitioner's undertaking to pay all outstanding tax, interest, late fee, penalty, and any other sums required. The Revenue conceded that upon compliance by the petitioner, the authority would consider the application for revocation of the cancelled registration. The Court directed the petitioner to make the payments within two weeks. Upon such payment, the Opposite Party was directed to consider the application for revocation of the cancellation of the registration certificate within a period not later than six weeks from the date of the order. The Writ Petition was disposed of in light of these directions.
Facts
The petitioner, Laxmipriya Biswal, challenged a show cause notice dated 14.08.2025 and the subsequent order dated 20.12.2025 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Bhubaneswar-III Circle, which cancelled her GST registration certificate. The petitioner expressed willingness to pay all outstanding tax, interest, late fee, penalty, and any other applicable sums along with the return. She relied on a coordinate bench's order in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises Vrs. The Commissioner, C.T & G.S.T, Odisha, Cuttack and Ors.) which condoned delay in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules and directed consideration of revocation application upon deposit of dues.
Key Issues
1. Whether the delay in the petitioner's application for revocation of GST registration cancellation should be condoned, considering her undertaking to pay all dues. (Question of law and fact, turning on the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules). Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that her case is covered by the order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises, where delay was condoned and the authority was directed to consider the revocation application subject to deposit of all dues. She is ready and willing to pay all taxes, interest, late fee, penalty, and other sums required. Revenue's Contention: The learned counsel for the Revenue, upon perusal of the cited order, conceded that if the petitioner complies with the undertaking and deposits the amounts, the concerned authority shall take necessary action.
Sections Cited
Rule 23
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 03.11.2026
This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
Heard.
Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that the show cause notice dated 14.08.2025 followed by the order dated 20.12.2025 cancelling the registration certificate of the Petitioner is under challenge. He submits that the Petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid along with the return. He relies on the order dated 16th November, 2022 of a coordinate Bench in Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 04-Nov-2026 10:5
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.