M/S.Ritika Ispat PVT. LTD.,Balanda, Sundergarh vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, Cuttack

WP(C)/22686/2026HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01053666202604 November 2026Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI,MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that the petitioner's request to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a better petition should be granted. The Court noted the memo filed by the petitioner's counsel seeking this liberty. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition as withdrawn, explicitly granting the petitioner the liberty to file a better petition. The reasoning is based on the petitioner's voluntary submission to withdraw and the court's discretion to permit such withdrawal with liberty, especially when no substantive arguments on merits have been addressed or decided. No specific issue was decided on the merits of the GST matter itself.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Ritika Ispat Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition (Civil) No. 22686 of 2026 before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The Opposite Parties were the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Goods and Services Tax, and others. The matter was heard by a Division Bench. The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a better petition. A memo to this effect was filed in court. The court noted the submission and proceeded with the disposal of the petition.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a better petition, considering the stage of the proceedings. Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner's counsel argued that they wished to withdraw the present Writ Petition to file a more comprehensive and better-drafted petition. No specific legal provisions or precedents were cited in support of this request, as the argument was procedural in nature, seeking permission to withdraw. Revenue/State's Argument: The judgment does not record any specific argument from the Opposite Parties (Revenue/State) regarding the withdrawal of the petition. Their role was to respond to the petition filed by the petitioner.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 22686 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010536662026 M/s. Ritika Ispat Pvt. Ltd., Sundargarh ..…... Petitioners (s) Mr. Bhabani Prasad Mohanty, Adv. -Versus- Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Goods and Services Tax, Ors. .. .…. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Sourav Tibrewal, Jr. Standing Counsel for CT & GST CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

ORDER

04.11.

2026 Order No.

02.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file better petition. A memo to that effect files in Court today. The same be kept on record.

3.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty as submitted.

( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi)

Judge

( Murahari Sri Raman)

Judge Murmu Digitally Signed Signe

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.