Rabindranath Behera vs. The Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha

WP(C)/36003/2026HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01085150202603 November 2026Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI,MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the writ petition could be disposed of based on the conceded position of the parties. The Petitioner was directed to make all payments as undertaken within two weeks. Upon such payment, the Opposite Party (revenue) was directed to consider the Petitioner's application for revocation of the cancellation of their GST registration certificate within a period not later than six weeks from the date of the order. The Court effectively followed the precedent set in the M/s. Mohanty Enterprises case, allowing for the revival of registration upon compliance with financial obligations. No issue was expressly left undecided.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Rabindranath Behera, challenged a show cause notice dated 08.08.2023 and an order dated 08.01.2025 that cancelled their GST registration. The petitioner expressed willingness to pay all outstanding taxes, interest, late fees, penalties, and any other dues. They relied on a previous order by a coordinate bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises Vrs. The Commissioner, C.T & G.S.T, Odisha, Cuttack and Ors.) which condoned delay in filing an application for revocation of registration, subject to deposit of dues. The revenue conceded that if the petitioner complied with their undertaking, the concerned authority would process the revocation application.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to have their GST registration revived upon payment of all dues, despite the delay in seeking revocation, in light of the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that their case is covered by the order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises, which allowed for condonation of delay in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the OGST Rules, subject to deposit of all taxes, interest, late fee, and penalty. They sought similar relief. Revenue's Contention: The revenue, after reviewing the cited order, conceded that if the petitioner fulfilled their undertaking to deposit the amounts due, the concerned authority would consider the application for revocation of cancellation of registration in accordance with law.

Sections Cited

Rule 23

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.36003 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010851502026 M/s. Rabindranath Behera …. Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourav Kumar Roy, Adv. versus- The Chief Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha & Anr. …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Sunil Mishra, Standing Counsel CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No. 01.

ORDER 03.11.2026

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2.

Heard.

3.

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that the show cause notice dated 08.08.2023 followed by the order of cancellation dated 08.01.2025 cancelling the registration certificate of the Petitioner is under challenge. He submits that the Petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid along with the return. He relies on the order dated 16th November, 2022 of a

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.