M/S Real 11 Fantasy Sports LLP vs. Additional Director, Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax Intelligence Meerut And 3 Others
Held
The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition due to the subsequent passing of a final order under Section 74 of the UPGST/CGST Act, 2017. The revenue and the State did not object to this request. Therefore, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No specific findings were made on the merits of the case, as the petition was disposed of on the procedural ground of withdrawal. The operative direction was to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn.
Facts
The petitioner, M/S Real 11 Fantasy Sports Llp, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of this petition, a final order was passed under Section 74 of the UPGST/CGST Act, 2017, on October 14, 2026. The petitioner's counsel then informed the Court that a final order had been passed and requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. The counsel for the revenue and the State had no objection to this request.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, given that a final order has been passed under Section 74 of the UPGST/CGST Act, 2017, during the pendency of the petition. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner, through their counsel, prayed to withdraw the writ petition as a final order under Section 74 of the UPGST/CGST Act, 2017, had been passed after the institution of the writ petition. Revenue/State's contention: The counsel for the revenue and the learned Standing Counsel for the State had no objection to the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition.
Sections Cited
Section 74
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4269 of 2026 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
At the outset, Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner states that after institution of this writ petition, final order under Section 74 of the UPGST/CGST Act, 2017 has been passed on 14.10.2026. He, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition, at this stage.
Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for the revenue and learned Standing Counsel for the State have no objection.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage. October 22, 2026 #Vikram/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suyash Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Dhananjay Awasthi (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) M/S Real 11 Fantasy Sports Llp .....Petitioner(s) Additional Director, Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax Intelligence Meerut And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.