M/S Gemini Distillers (T) Private Limited vs. The State Of Tripura And Ors.
Held
The Court did not decide the merits of the case. After hearing arguments, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner intended to avail the appellate remedy available under Section 107 of the Tripura GST Act, 2017, and requested liberty to raise all permissible grounds of law and fact in the appeal. The counsel for the CBEC and the State tax authorities had no objection to this prayer. Consequently, the High Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and disposed of it with the liberty granted to the petitioner. Pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Gemini Distillers (T) Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Tripura challenging demand orders dated June 27, 2023, issued by Respondent No. 3. These orders pertained to Financial Years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21, demanding over Rs. 11 crores in tax, along with penalty and interest. The petitioner argued that the demand orders were perverse, passed without jurisdiction, imposed illegal levies, and were in breach of natural justice. The State tax authorities and the Commissioner, CGST, Agartala, were respondents. During the proceedings, the Commissioner, CGST, Agartala, made submissions regarding a CBEC circular. However, the Additional Commissioner of Taxes & Excise, Government of Tripura, was not fully abreast of relevant state government notifications.
Key Issues
1. Whether the demand orders dated 27.06.2023, for FY 2017-18 to 2020-21, amounting to over Rs. 11 crores (tax) along with penalty and interest, passed by Respondent No. 3, are perverse in law, passed without jurisdiction, impose an illegal levy, and are in serious breach of the principles of natural justice, as contended by the petitioner? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that the demand orders were perverse, passed without jurisdiction, imposed illegal levies, and violated principles of natural justice. They sought to quash these orders. The petitioner also sought a stay on the demand orders and a direction to prevent coercive action. Revenue/State's Contention: The Commissioner, CGST, Agartala, made submissions regarding Circular No. 31/05/2018-GST dated 09.02.2018 issued by CBEC. The Additional Commissioner of Taxes & Excise, Government of Tripura, was not fully informed about state government notifications and could not make submissions on the instant issue. No specific arguments were recorded for the State tax authorities beyond this.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Order
19/10/2023
Mr. Talla Venkata Ravi, Commissioner, CGST, Agartala and Mr. Lalfaktlinga Hrangchal, Additional Commissioner of Taxes & Excise, Government of Tripura are present pursuant to the order dated 16.10.2023. Heard Mr. B.N. Majumder, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Paramartha Datta, learned counsel for the CBEC and the Commissioner, CGST, Agartala and Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, learned Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Karnajit De, lea
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Tripura High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.