M/S Nanz Med Science Pharma PVT LTD vs. The State Of Hp And Others

CWP/10167/2024HC Himachal PradeshGSTCNR HPHC01044365202412 March 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to not press the writ petitions. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's explicit instruction to withdraw the petitions to avail the GST amnesty scheme. The Court found the prayer to be innocuous and therefore granted it. The ratio decidendi is that a petitioner seeking to avail a government scheme, and consequently not pressing their writ petition, will be permitted to do so, provided the prayer is not opposed or is otherwise considered benign. The operative direction was to dispose of all the petitions as 'not pressed' with liberty to the petitioner to avail the aforementioned scheme. No issues were expressly left undecided, as the petitions were withdrawn by the petitioner.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Nanz Med Science Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed three writ petitions (CWP Nos. 10167, 10166, and 10222 of 2024) before the Himachal Pradesh High Court. The petitions were against the State of Himachal Pradesh and other respondents. The specific tax periods and the exact nature of the orders or actions under challenge, as well as the amount in dispute, are not explicitly detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The procedural history leading to these petitions is also not elaborated upon.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to avail the GST amnesty scheme launched by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs? The petitioner's counsel stated that they were under instructions not to press the petitions. This was to enable the petitioner to avail the GST amnesty scheme. The respondents, represented by the Advocate General and other law officers, did not appear to argue against this course of action, as the petitioner's prayer was described as innocuous.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 ( 2025:HHC:6387 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 10167 of 2024 a/w CWP Nos. 10166 & 10222 of 2024 Decided on: 12.03.2025

1.

CWP No.10167 of 2024 M/s Nanz Med Science Pharma Pvt. Ltd. ...…..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …..Respondents.

2.

CWP No.10166 of 2024 M/s Nanz Med Science Pharma Pvt. Ltd. ...…..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …..Respondents.

3.

CWP No.10222 of 2024 M/s Nanz Med Science Pharma Pvt. Ltd. ...…..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Rakesh Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Gautam, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr.I.N.Mehta, Sr. Additional Advocate General, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General.

2 ( 2025:HHC:6387 ) Tarlok Sing

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Himachal Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.