M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And Anr

WP(C)/906/2026HC GauhatiGSTCNR GAHC01022466202514 October 2026Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Gauhati High Court. Pursuant to a court order dated 30.09.2026, the petitioner appeared before the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Dibrugarh, on 09.10.2026. Following this appearance, an order was passed on 14.10.2026 by the Commissioner, dropping all charges framed in three Show Cause Notices. These notices pertained to periods from July 1999 to June 2008 and were issued under Section 11A(10) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The writ petition was then closed as nothing further survived.

Held

The Court held that since the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Dibrugarh, had passed an order on 14.10.2026 dropping all charges framed in the Show Cause Notices issued to the petitioner for the periods July 1999 to June 2008 under Section 11A(10) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, there was nothing further for the writ petition to adjudicate. The Court noted that the operative part of the Commissioner's order explicitly stated the dropping of charges. Consequently, the writ petition was closed. Any interim order that might have been in place was also vacated.

Key Issues

1. Whether the charges framed in the Show Cause Notices issued under Section 11A(10) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for the periods July 1999 to June 2008 should be dropped. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that following their appearance before the Commissioner as directed by the Court, the Commissioner had passed an order dropping all charges. Therefore, no further action was required in the writ petition. Revenue's contention: The revenue, represented by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Dibrugarh, and the Union of India, did not record any specific arguments against the dropping of charges. Their participation was in response to the court's direction and the subsequent order passed by the Commissioner.

Sections Cited

Section 11A(10)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010224662025 2026:GAU-AS:15835 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/906/2026 M/S HINDUSTAN COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PVT. LTD. PLOT NO. 60, WITH ITS PRINCIPAL EASTERN ZONAL OFFICE AT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, KHURDA, ODISHA-752055. VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CX, DIBRUGARH AND ANR DIBRUGARH COMMISSIONERATE, MILAN NAGAR F-LANE, P.O. C.R. BUILDING, DIBRUGARH-786003. 2:THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110001 For the Petitioner (s) : Mr. A. Chakraborty, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. C. Keyal, SC. GST MS. N. Kakati, Advocate Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
15.10.

2026

Heard Mr. A. Chakraborty, the

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.