Manoj Aggarwal vs. The Commissioner Of Customs & Anr.

W.P.(C)/15484/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01076711202509 October 2025Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC, CBIC with Ms. Arya Suresh Nair, Ms. Shreya Lamba, Mr. Dhananjay Gautam & Mr. Akhil Sharma, Advs. 32 AND
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

This judgment concerns two writ petitions, W.P.(C)15484/2025 filed by Manoj Aggarwal and W.P.(C) 9410/2021 filed by Kanwal Chaudhary. The petitioner in W.P.(C)15484/2025 is challenging an order or action by the Commissioner of Customs and another respondent. The petitioner in W.P.(C) 9410/2021 is challenging actions by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and other respondents, including the Bar Council of India (BCI). The specific tax periods, amounts in dispute, and the exact nature of the orders or actions under challenge are not detailed in this excerpt. The procedural history indicates these matters are before the Delhi High Court, with applications and a review petition filed in one of the writ petitions. The hearing was conducted through a hybrid mode.

Held

The Court has not rendered a decision on the merits of the writ petitions in this excerpt. The order simply directs that the matters be listed for further hearing on February 12th, 2026. Consequently, there are no findings on any issues, no reasoning provided, and no ratio decidendi established. No operative directions have been issued beyond scheduling the next date of hearing. Any issues that may have been raised by the parties remain undecided at this stage.

Key Issues

The provided text is an interim order scheduling further listing of the cases and does not contain the substantive issues that the Court had to decide, nor does it record any arguments made by the petitioner or the revenue/state. Therefore, the specific questions of law or mixed law and fact, the provisions of law they turn on, and the contentions of each side, including any authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon, are not available in this excerpt. The Court has not yet adjudicated on the merits of the petitions.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(C)15484/2025
W.P.(C) 9410/2021

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~31, 32 (SDB) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)15484/2025 MANOJ AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, Adv. (9891612399) versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC, CBIC with Ms. Arya Suresh Nair, Ms. Shreya Lamba, Mr. Dhananjay Gautam & Mr. Akhil Sharma, Advs. 32 AND + W.P.(C) 9410/2021 KANWAL CHAUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Adv. (M: 9873137839) versus INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Verma, Mr. Akhil Ranganathan, S, Mr. Nikhil Thakur & Mr. Saksham Thareja, Advs. Mr. Ajay Kumar Agarwal, Adv. for R- 3. Mr. Ruchesh Sinha, SSC, CGST with Ms. Upasna Vashistha, Adv. for R-4. Mr. Preetpal Singh, Ms. Simran Kumari and Ms. Pooja, Adv. for BCI. (M: 8585985322) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

% 07.02.2026

1.

The hearing has been done through hybrid mode. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2026 at 13:04:34

CM APPL.65995/2025 in W.P.(C)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.