M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack
Facts
The Petitioner, M/s. Kalinga Paper Marth, Sundergarh, filed a Writ Petition before the Orissa High Court challenging an order in appeal dated 27.01.2025 passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Territorial Range, Sundargarh, Rourkela. The Petitioner contended that at the time of filing the writ petition on 04.07.2025, the GST Appellate Tribunal had not been constituted. Consequently, the Petitioner was compelled to approach the High Court. The Petitioner sought liberty to approach the now-functional GST Appellate Tribunal to challenge both the appellate order and the original adjudication order. The Opposite Parties, represented by the Commissioner of CT & GST, Odisha, noted that the statutory time limit for filing an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal had expired on 31st July, 2026.
Held
The Court held that the Writ Petition was filed on 4th July, 2025, at a time when the GST Appellate Tribunal had not been constituted. In these circumstances, the Petitioner was justified in approaching the High Court to challenge the appellate and adjudication orders. The Court granted liberty to the Petitioner to approach the GST Appellate Tribunal by filing an appeal in accordance with law within fifteen days from the date of the order. The Court further directed that if such an appeal is filed, the GST Appellate Tribunal should admit the appeal subject to statutory compliance and take into consideration the period during which the matter remained pending before the High Court. The Writ Petition was disposed of with these observations and liberty.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Petitioner can be granted liberty to file an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal after the statutory period for filing has expired, considering the Writ Petition was filed when the Tribunal was not functional? (Question of law and mixed fact and law) Petitioner's Contention: The Petitioner argued that the Writ Petition was filed on 4th July, 2025, at a time when the GST Appellate Tribunal was not constituted. Therefore, approaching the High Court was necessitated by the absence of the statutory appellate forum. They sought permission to file an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal, which is now functional, and requested that the period during which the matter was pending before the High Court be considered for condonation of delay. Revenue's Contention: The Opposite Parties submitted that the time prescribed for filing an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal had already expired on 31st July, 2026.
Sections Cited
Articles 226, Articles 227
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 15.10.2026
This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for Petitioner that the Petitioner has challenged the order in appeal dated 27.01.2025 passed under the Odisha Goods and Services Tax by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal) Territorial Range, Sundargarh, Rourkela by way of filing this Writ Petition invoking the provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.