Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.

W.P.(C)/5792/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01026059202514 October 2026Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL3 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Rana Gurtej Singh, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Devvrat Yadav, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Mr. Manhan Chawla and Ms. Pearl Sharma, Advs
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The Petitioner, Sanjay Maheshwari, filed two writ petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging orders passed under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). In W.P.(C) 5792/2025, the Petitioner sought to quash a Show Cause Notice (SCN) and an Order-in-Original (OIO) concerning the Financial Year 2017-2018, primarily arguing the OIO was time-barred under Section 74(9) of the CGST Act. The Respondents contended the OIO was issued within the limitation period under Section 74(10) and sent via email on 05.01.2025. In W.P.(C) 5832/2025, the Petitioner challenged an SCN and OIO, arguing the SCN was issued beyond the prescribed limitation period. The Respondents countered that the SCN was sent via email on 03.08.2025, within the limitation period ending 05.08.2025, despite being uploaded on the portal on 09.08.2024.

Held

The Court noted that in both writ petitions, an efficacious remedy of appeal was available to the Petitioner against the impugned Orders-in-Original. The rival contentions raised by both parties involved disputed questions of fact. The Court held that these disputed questions of fact were more appropriately examined by the Appellate Authority in the proceedings arising from such appeals. Consequently, the Court relegated the Petitioners to the remedy of appeal in both petitions. The Court further observed that if the Petitioners sought exclusion of the period during which the writ petitions remained pending, under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the Appellate Authority would consider such request in accordance with law. The Court did not decide the merits of the limitation arguments.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Order-in-Original (OIO) dated 27.01.2025 in W.P.(C) 5792/2025, concerning Financial Year 2017-2018, was barred by limitation as provided under Section 74(9) of the CGST Act. The Petitioner argued it was time-barred, while the Respondents contended it was issued within the period prescribed by Section 74(10) of the CGST Act, citing dispatch via email on 05.01.2025. 2. Whether the Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 25.07.2024 in W.P.(C) 5832/2025 was issued beyond the prescribed period of limitation. The Petitioner asserted it was time-barred, whereas the Respondents argued it was sent via email on 03.08.2025, prior to the expiry of the limitation period on 05.08.2025.

Sections Cited

Section 74(9), Section 74(10), Section 14

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(C) 5792/2025
W.P.(C) 5832/2025

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~72&73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010260592025 + W.P.(C) 5792/2025 and CM APPL. 26389/2025 SANJAY MAHESHWARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rana Gurtej Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Devvrat Yadav, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Mr. Manhan Chawla and Ms. Pearl Sharma, Advs. (73) # CNR No. DLHC010261002025 + W.P.(C) 5832/2025 and CM APPL. 26644/2025 SANJAY MAHESHWARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rana Gurtej Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Devvrat Yadav, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Mr. Manhan Chawla and Ms. Pearl Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR

%

14.10.

2026

1.

This order shall dispose of two (02) connected Writ Petitions. W.P.(C) 5792/2025

2.

By way of the present Petition, the Petitioner seeks issuance of any appropriate writ, quashing Form DR-01 dated 04.08.2024, Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 30.07.2025 and the consequential Order-in- Original (OIO) dated 27.01.2025, with respect to Financial Year

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.