Legend INDIA Environment Protection PVT. LTD. vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Held
The Court did not decide the substantive issues raised by the petitioner. After partial arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court allowed this prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to avail of the departmental remedy. Therefore, no findings were made on the entitlement to contract revision, inclusion of GST, or interest. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn with liberty to pursue departmental remedies.
Facts
The petitioner, Legend India Environment Protection Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court seeking a direction to the respondents to revise contracts awarded to it for running an Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) at Naini, Prayagraj. The revision sought was to include Goods and Services Tax (GST) applicable, along with interest, for the Financial Years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. The petition was presented before the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prakash Padia.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for revision of its contracts to include applicable GST and interest for the financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20? The petitioner argued that the contracts should be revised to incorporate GST and interest. The respondents' arguments are not recorded as the petition was withdrawn. No specific provisions of the GST Act were explicitly discussed in relation to the arguments presented by either party, as the matter was disposed of at an early stage.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Court No. - 9 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6243 of 2021 Petitioner :- Legend India Environment Protection Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikrant Pandey,Dharam Narayan Tiwari,Jitendra Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra,Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Sanjay Yadav,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Matter taken up through video conferencing.
The petitioner, by way of present petition, seeks direction to the respondents to revise the contracts given to the petitioner by adding GST applicable along with interest on it on the contracts of the petitioner for running the STP at Naini, Prayagraj for the Financial Years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of petition with liberty to avail the departmental remedy.
Prayer allowed.
Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the said liberty.
Order Date :- 9.6.2021 Kirti (Prakash Padia, J) (Sanjay Yadav, ACJ)
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.