Commissioner Of Central G.S.T. And Central Excise J And K Jammu. vs. Parental Pharma PVT.LTD.
Held
The Court directed the issuance of notice to the respondent, Parental Pharma Pvt. Ltd., for July 2, 2019, to show cause as to why the appeal should not be admitted. In the interim, the Court ordered that subject to the appellant releasing 50% of the amount due in terms of the impugned CESTAT judgment order dated August 29, 2018, to the respondent entrepreneur, upon furnishing of solvent surety to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional Commissioner within four weeks of furnishing the surety, the payment of the balance amount shall remain stayed. The Court also allowed an application for dispensing with the filing of a certified copy of the impugned order.
Facts
This case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu, against an order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The CESTAT had passed an order on August 29, 2018, in relation to appeal numbers E/53960/2015, E/53961/2015, E/53962/2015, and E/53963/2015. The High Court was considering the admission of the appeal and had issued notice to the respondent, Parental Pharma Pvt. Ltd. The Court also addressed an interlocutory application (IA No. 1/2019) and a miscellaneous civil application (MCC No. 160/2019). The appeal concerns a dispute where the appellant seeks to challenge the CESTAT's order.
Key Issues
1. Whether the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu, against the CESTAT's order dated August 29, 2018, should be admitted for hearing? (Question of law). The appellant's counsel relied on an earlier order of the High Court in CEA No. 09.2018, where notice had been issued to show cause why the appeal should not be admitted, and directions were also issued. The appellant argued for the admission of the appeal. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the provided text.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
Reg. List Item No. 24 c/w
CEA No. 118/2019
IA No. 1/2019
Date of order: 08.04.2019
Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise J&K Jammu. Vs. Parental Pharma Pvt. Ltd.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jag Paul Singh, Advocate.
For the reasons stated in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. Accordingly, filling of the certified copy of the impugned order is dispensed with. CEA No. 118/2019 & IA No. 1/2019 Learned counsel for the appellant places reliance on an earlier order passed by this Court in CEA No. 09.2018, in which notice has been issued to show cause as to why the appeal be not admitted and directions have also been issued. Issue notice to the respondents for 02.07.2019 to show cause as to why the appeal be not admitted. In the meant
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.