Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise Jammu vs. Hardcastle Petrofer PVT.LTD.

CEA/61/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02009865201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court decided to dispose of the present appeal in terms of the detailed order passed in CEA No. 05/2018, Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited. The reasoning and findings of the Court in that connected case would therefore apply to this appeal. The operative directions would be those specified in the order for CEA No. 05/2018. No specific issues were decided or left undecided in relation to Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited in this judgment itself, as it relies on a separate, more detailed order.

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited. The judgment states that the present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed order passed in a connected matter, CEA No. 05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. No specific facts regarding the dispute between the Commissioner and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited, the tax period, the order under challenge, the authority that passed it, or the amount in dispute are recorded in this judgment.

Key Issues

The judgment does not explicitly state the issues that the Court had to decide in this specific appeal. It indicates that the appeal is disposed of based on the decision in a connected case, CEA No. 05/2018. Therefore, the issues decided in that connected case would implicitly govern the disposal of this appeal. However, the specific legal questions and arguments presented by the petitioner (Commissioner) and the respondent (Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited) for this particular appeal are not detailed in the provided text. The judgment does not record any arguments made by either side for this case.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 61/2018 IA No.01/2018 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited … Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram : RAJ K

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.