Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise , J And K vs. Hardcastle Petrofer PVT. LTD.

CEA/53/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02009910201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the present appeal, CEA No. 53/2018, is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed in CEA No. 05/2018, Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited. The reasoning and specific findings from the order in CEA No. 05/2018 are not reproduced here, but the operative direction is to dispose of this appeal in line with that decision. The ratio decidendi would be that if a matter is factually and legally identical to a previously decided case, it should follow the precedent set by that case. No specific issues were decided on merits for Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited in this judgment, as it was disposed of based on a connected matter.

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited. The appeal was decided on August 21, 2019. The order indicates that the present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed order passed in a connected matter, CEA No. 05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. No specific facts regarding the dispute between the Commissioner and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited are detailed in this judgment.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is to be disposed of in terms of the order passed in CEA No. 05/2018 (Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited)? Petitioner's Argument: The appellant (Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise) contends that the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed in the connected matter, CEA No. 05/2018. No specific arguments are recorded for the respondent (Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited) as none appeared. Revenue's Argument: The revenue, through the appellant, seeks to have this appeal decided based on the outcome of the aforementioned connected appeal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 53/2018 IA No.01/2018 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited … Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram : RAJ KUM

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.