Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise Jammu vs. Crystal Crop Protection PVT.LTD.

CEA/39/2019HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02010432201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the present appeal (CEA No. 39/2019) is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed on the same day in CEA No.05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. The reasoning for this decision is that the present appeal is to be governed by the principles and directions laid down in the aforementioned connected case. The operative direction is to dispose of this appeal in line with the decision in CEA No.05/2018. The specific findings, reasoning, and ratio decidendi from the order in CEA No.05/2018 are not detailed in this judgment, but it is implied that the outcome of this appeal will mirror that of the connected case. No issues were expressly left undecided.

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against Crystal Crop Protection Private Limited. The appeal concerns a dispute related to Goods and Services Tax (GST). The judgment states that the present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed order passed in a connected matter, CEA No.05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. No specific details regarding the tax period, amount in dispute, or the specific order under challenge are provided in this judgment, other than it being an appeal against the respondent.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the order passed in CEA No.05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. Appellant's Contention: The appellant, through its counsel, argued that the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed in the connected matter, CEA No.05/2018. No other arguments were recorded. Respondent's Contention: No arguments were recorded for the respondent, Crystal Crop Protection Private Limited, as none appeared.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 39/2019 IA No.01/2019 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Crystal Crop Protection Private Limited …. Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram : RAJ KUMAR 2019.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.