Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise , J And K vs. Hardcastle Petrofer PVT. LTD

CEA/50/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02010079201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court decided to dispose of the present appeal in terms of the detailed order passed in CEA No. 05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. This implies that the findings and reasoning from that connected case would apply to this appeal. The specific reasoning and ratio decidendi are not elaborated upon in this judgment, as it is a reference to another order. Consequently, the operative directions would also be those stipulated in the referenced order. No issues were expressly left undecided in this judgment, as it adopted the outcome of the connected matter.

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against an order concerning Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited. The judgment states that the present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed order passed on the same day in a connected matter, CEA No. 05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. No specific tax period, amount in dispute, or the order under challenge is detailed in this judgment itself, as it refers to a separate, more comprehensive order.

Key Issues

The judgment does not explicitly frame the issues for determination in this specific appeal. Instead, it indicates that the appeal is disposed of based on the decision in a connected case, CEA No. 05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. Therefore, the issues decided would be those addressed in that referenced judgment. The petitioner (Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise) is the appellant, and the respondent is Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited. The arguments presented by either side in this specific appeal are not recorded, as the decision relies on a prior, detailed order.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 50/2018 IA No.01/2018 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited … Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram : RAJ KUMAR

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.