Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise , J And K vs. Hardcastle Petrofer PVT. LTD.

CEA/33/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02009890201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the present appeal, CEA No. 37/2018, is to be disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed on the same day in CEA No. 05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. The reasoning for this decision is that the present appeal is being decided based on the precedent set by the connected matter. The operative direction is that the appeal is disposed of in terms of the aforementioned order. No specific issues related to GST provisions were decided in this particular judgment, as it relies entirely on the outcome of the connected case.

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against an order concerning Hardcastle Pretrofer Limited. The specific tax period(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in this judgment. The judgment indicates that the present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed order passed in a connected matter, CEA No. 05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. The procedural history leading to this appeal is not detailed, other than the fact that it is an appeal before the High Court.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is to be disposed of in terms of the order passed in CEA No. 05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'? The appellant, Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, argued that the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed in a connected case, CEA No. 05/2018. No arguments were recorded for the respondent, Hardcastle Pretrofer Limited.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 37/2018 IA No.01/2018 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Hardcastle Pretrofer Limited … Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram : RAJ

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.