Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise , J And K vs. Hardcastle Petrofer PVT. LTD.

CEA/52/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02009884201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the present appeal, CEA No. 52/2018, is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed in CEA No. 05/2018, 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. The reasoning is that the present appeal is to be governed by the decision in the related case. The ratio decidendi is that if a case is to be decided based on a precedent set in another judgment on the same day, then the outcome of the present case will mirror that of the precedent. The operative direction is the disposal of the appeal in terms of the order in CEA No. 05/2018. No specific issues were expressly left undecided, as the entire appeal was disposed of based on the related order.

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited. The judgment states that the present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed order passed on the same day in a different, but related, case: CEA No. 05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. No specific tax period, amount in dispute, or the order/action under challenge is detailed for this particular appeal. The procedural history is limited to the filing of this appeal by the revenue.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide the following issue: 1. Whether the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the order passed in CEA No. 05/2018, 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. The appellant (Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise) argued that the present appeal should be decided in line with the decision in the aforementioned related case. No arguments were recorded for the respondent (Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited).

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 52/2018 IA No.01/2018 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited … Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram : RAJ KUM

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.