Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise , J And K vs. Nitin Enterprises

CEA/9/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02009631201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the present appeal, CEA No. 09/2018, is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed in CEA No. 05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. This implies that the outcome of the present appeal is directly contingent upon the decision in the Sun Pharma case. The reasoning would be that the legal principles or factual matrix in both cases are sufficiently similar to warrant a consistent decision. The ratio decidendi would be that appeals can be disposed of based on the precedent set in a connected or similar case, especially when one party is absent or does not contest the application of that precedent. No specific operative directions or relief granted are detailed here, as they are presumed to be in the referenced order.

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against Nitin Enterprises. The appeal was decided on 21.08.2019. The Court disposed of the present appeal in terms of a detailed order passed in a connected matter, CEA No. 05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. No specific facts regarding the tax period, amount in dispute, or the order under challenge are detailed in this judgment itself, as it refers to another order for the substantive decision.

Key Issues

The primary issue is whether the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the order passed in CEA No. 05/2018. The Court had to decide if the principles and findings in the aforementioned connected case were applicable to the present appeal. The appellant, the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, argued that the appeal should be decided based on the ruling in the Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited case. The respondent, Nitin Enterprises, did not present any arguments as none were recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 09/2018 IA No.01/2018 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Nitin Enterprises …. Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram :

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.