Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise , J And K vs. Biostadt INDIA Limited

CEA/95/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02010128201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the present appeal (CEA No. 95/2018) is to be disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed on the same day in CEA No. 05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. The reasoning for this decision is that the present appeal is being decided analogously to the connected matter. The operative direction is the disposal of the appeal in line with the aforementioned order. No specific findings on the merits of the GST dispute are recorded in this judgment, as it relies on the decision in the connected case. The specific issues decided in CEA No. 05/2018 are not detailed here, but the principle is that if appeals are connected and heard together, they are disposed of based on the common order.

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against Biostadt India Limited. The appeal was decided on August 21, 2019. The Court disposed of the present appeal in terms of a detailed order passed on the same day in a connected matter, CEA No. 05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. No specific tax period, amount in dispute, or the specific order under challenge is detailed in this judgment, other than it being an appeal against the respondent. The procedural history leading to this appeal is not elaborated.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is to be disposed of in terms of the order passed in CEA No. 05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. Arguments: Petitioner (Appellant): The appellant argued that the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the order passed in the connected matter, CEA No. 05/2018. No specific statutory provisions or precedents were cited in this judgment for this argument. Respondent: None appeared, and therefore, no arguments were recorded on behalf of the respondent.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 95/2018 IA No. 01/2018 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Biostadt India Limited …. Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram : RAJ K

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.