Commssr Of Central GST And Central Excise vs. Crystal Crop Protection PVT.LTD.

CEA/130/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02010458201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the present appeal (CEA No. 130/2018) is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed in CEA No. 05/2018, Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited. The reasoning for this decision is that the present appeal is to be governed by the precedent set in the aforementioned connected case. The operative direction is the disposal of this appeal in line with the order in CEA No. 05/2018. No specific issues regarding GST provisions or amounts in dispute for Crystal Crop Protection Private Limited were discussed or decided in this order, as it relies entirely on the outcome of another case.

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against Crystal Crop Protection Private Limited. The appeal was decided on August 21, 2019. The judgment states that the present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed order passed in a connected case, CEA No. 05/2018, titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. No specific facts regarding the dispute between the Commissioner and Crystal Crop Protection Private Limited are detailed in this order.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the order passed in CEA No. 05/2018 (Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited)? Petitioner's Argument: The appellant (Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise) argued that the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed in the connected case, CEA No. 05/2018. No specific arguments were recorded for the respondent (Crystal Crop Protection Private Limited) as none appeared. Revenue/State's Argument: The appellant's argument is as stated above. The respondent did not present any arguments.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 130/2018 IA No.01/2018 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Crystal Crop Protection Private Limited … Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram : RAJ KUMAR

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.