Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise , J And K vs. Biostadt INDIA Limited

CEA/94/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02010164201821 August 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the present appeal (CEA No. 94/2018) is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed in CEA No. 05/2018, which concerned Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited. The reasoning and findings from the Sun Pharma case would therefore apply to this case. The operative direction is the disposal of this appeal in line with the aforementioned order. No specific issues were decided independently for this appeal, as it was decided based on a connected matter. The judgment does not specify any issues left undecided.

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, against Biostadt India Limited. The appeal was decided on August 21, 2019. The Court disposed of the present appeal in terms of a detailed order passed in a connected matter, CEA No. 05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. The respondent, Biostadt India Limited, was represented by no one. The specific tax period, order or action under challenge, authority that passed it, amount in dispute, and procedural history are not detailed in this specific judgment, as it refers to another order for the substantive decision.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal should be disposed of in terms of the order passed in CEA No. 05/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited'. Petitioner's Argument: The appellant (Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise) argued that the present appeal should be disposed of in line with the decision in the connected case of Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited. No specific arguments were recorded for the respondent as none appeared. Revenue/State's Argument: Not applicable as the appellant is the revenue.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CEA No. 94/2018 IA No. 01/2018 Decided on: 21.08.2019 Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu …Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. v/s Biostadt India Limited …. Respondent(s) Through:- None. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER

RAJESH BINDAL, J

The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the detailed order passed today in CEA No.05/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited’.

(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal)

Judge Judge Jammu 21.08.2019 Raj Kumar

Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.

Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.

Coram : RAJ K

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.