Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise , J And K vs. Biostadt INDIA Limited
Held
The Court held that the present appeal (CEA No. 75/2018) is to be disposed of in terms of the order passed in CEA No. 13/2018. This implies that the outcome of this appeal is contingent upon the decision in the connected matter. The reasoning is that the present appeal is being decided by reference to another order, rather than on its own specific facts and legal arguments. The ratio decidendi would likely be the principle established in CEA No. 13/2018. No specific operative directions or relief granted for this particular appeal are detailed, beyond the reference to the other order. No issues were expressly left undecided, as the matter was disposed of by reference.
Facts
This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu against Biostadt India Limited. The judgment states that the present appeal is disposed of in terms of an order passed on the same day in a different, but related, appeal, CEA No. 13/2018 titled 'Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu v. Nitin Enterprises'. No specific facts regarding the dispute between the Commissioner and Biostadt India Limited, the tax period, the order under challenge, the authority that passed it, or the amount in dispute are recorded in this judgment.
Key Issues
The judgment does not explicitly frame any questions of law or mixed law and fact for the Court to decide. Consequently, no arguments from either the petitioner (Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise) or the respondent (Biostadt India Limited) are recorded. The appeal is disposed of based on the decision in a connected matter, CEA No. 13/2018, without addressing the specific merits of this case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER
RAJESH BINDAL, J
The present appeal is disposed of in terms of the order passed today in CEA No.13/2018 titled as ‘Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K), Jammu v. Nitin Enterprises’.
(Rashid Ali Dar)
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge Judge Jammu. 02.09.2019 Vinod.
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No
Whether the order is reportable :Yes/No S.No.08
VINOD KUMAR 2019.09.05 08:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.