Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise Jammu vs. M/S Casil Industries LTD Igc Samba

CEA/250/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02001938202222 September 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the issue involved in the present appeal has already been considered and decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, which were dismissed. Since the matter is covered by the previous judgment and no new grounds have been urged by the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment dated 23.05.2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The ratio decidendi is that identical issues previously decided by a coordinate bench, without new grounds being raised, warrant dismissal of the subsequent appeal. The operative direction is the dismissal of the appeal.

Facts

This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise Jammu against M/s Casil Industries Ltd. The appeal concerns an issue that had previously been considered by a Coordinate Bench of the High Court in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. Those prior appeals were dismissed. The appellant has not urged any new grounds in the present appeal. The respondent, M/s Casil Industries Ltd., was represented by no one.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is barred by the principles of res judicata or constructive res judicata, given that a Coordinate Bench of this Court has already decided the identical issue in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The appellant's contention is that the present appeal should be considered on its merits, and that the previous judgment, while dealing with a similar issue, may not be directly applicable or that new arguments could be presented. The appellant argues that no new grounds have been urged, implying that the appeal is being pursued based on the existing legal framework and interpretation. The respondent did not present any arguments.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
S. No. 3 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 250/2022 CM Nos. 5331/2022 & 5332/2022 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise Jammu …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Vs M/s Casil Industries Ltd. IGC Samba .…. Respondent(s) Through: None Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE

ORDER

The issue involved in this appeal has already been considered by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, those appeals were dismissed. Since the matter stands already covered by the aforementioned judgment and in view of the fact that no new ground has been urged by the appellant, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in judgment dated 23.05.2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

(RAJESH SEKHRI) (RAJNESH OSWAL)

JUDGE

JUDGE

Jammu 22.09.2022 Neha 2022:JKLHC-JMU:4607-DB

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.