Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S R B Jodhamal And Co PVT LTD Tope Sherkhania Jammu J And K

CEA/272/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006096202117 October 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal was identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the Court vide its judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. Since no new grounds were presented by the appellant, the matter was squarely covered by the aforementioned decision. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the prior judgment. The ratio decidendi is that appeals with identical facts and no new grounds are bound by previous High Court judgments on similar matters.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal against M/s R B Jodhamal and Co. Pvt. Ltd. (respondent). The appeal was similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh in a judgment dated May 23, 2022, where CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court noted that no new grounds were available to the appellant, indicating the matter was squarely covered by the prior decision.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals? Petitioner/Appellant's Argument: The appellant argued that the present appeal raises no new grounds and is identical to previously decided matters, implying it should be dismissed on the same terms. Respondent's Argument: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the respondent. However, the Court's decision implies that the respondent's position, as reflected in the prior judgments, was upheld.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No.272/2022 CM Nos. 5983/2022, 5984/2022 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate V/s M/S R B Jodhamal and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Tope Sherkhania Jammu J and K ….Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

ORDER 17.10.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.