Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Berger Paints INDIA LTD Sidco Igc Samba J And K

CEA/319/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02003667202214 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated 23rd May 2022 in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The reasoning was that the appellant had not presented any new grounds for appeal, making the matter identical to the previously decided cases. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the prior judgment. The ratio decidendi is that appeals with identical facts and no new grounds will be decided based on established precedents of the same court. No specific operative directions were given beyond the dismissal of the appeal.

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu against M/S Berger Paints India Ltd. The appeal concerns a matter identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. The Court noted that no new grounds were presented by the appellant. The judgment refers to a prior decision dated 23rd May 2022 in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals as the leading case.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated 23rd May 2022 in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that the appellant has not presented any new grounds. Contentions: Petitioner/Appellant: The appellant argued that the matter should be considered on its merits. However, the Court noted that the appellant had no new grounds to present. Revenue/State: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the respondent (M/S Berger Paints India Ltd.).

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Sr. No. 26 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 319/2022 CM Nos. 6572/2022, 6573/2022 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Versus < M/S Berger Paints India Ltd. SIDCO IGC Samba J and K .....Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE

ORDER 14.11.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order date

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.