Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. Nanda Mint And Pine Chemicals LTD

CEA/320/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02003505202214 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal was similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the Court vide judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals. Since no new grounds were available to the appellant, the matter was squarely covered by the prior decision. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the earlier judgment. The ratio decidendi is that appeals with identical facts and no new grounds are bound by previous judgments of the same court. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal against an order concerning Nanda Mint and Pine Chemicals Ltd. (respondent). The appeal was heard by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu. The Court noted that this appeal was similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the Court in a judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, where CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court found no new grounds were available to the appellant. The matter was deemed to be squarely covered by the prior decision.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment and order of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals? Petitioner/Appellant's Argument: The appellant argued that the appeal was identical to previously decided cases and that no new grounds were available for consideration. The appellant relied on the precedent set by the Court's judgment in CEA No. 10/2020. Respondent's Argument: The judgment records no specific argument from the respondent.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Sr. No. 27 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 320/2022 CM No. 6574/2022 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate Versus < Nanda Mint and Pine Chemicals Ltd. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE

ORDER 14.11.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.