Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. Dabur INDIA Limited Sidco Industrial Complex Bari Brahmana Jammu

CEA/251/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006516202116 November 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is identical and similar to several other Excise Appeals that were previously considered and decided by the Court in its judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022, with CEA No. 10 of 2020 being the leading case. Since no new grounds were presented by the appellant, the matter was squarely covered by the previous decision. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The ratio decidendi is that appeals raising identical issues and grounds as those already decided by a coordinate bench, without any new arguments or facts, should follow the precedent set by the earlier decision.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K, Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal against Dabur India Limited (respondent). The appeal was identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. The leading case for those decisions was CEA No. 10 of 2020, with a judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court found no new grounds were available to the appellant. The appeal was therefore dismissed on the same terms as the prior judgment.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that the present appeal is stated to be similar and identical to those cases. Petitioner/Appellant's Contention: The appellant argued that the present appeal raises no new grounds and is squarely covered by the prior decision of this Court in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. Therefore, it should be dismissed on the same terms. Respondent's Contention: No arguments were recorded for the respondent as none appeared.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 251/2022 CM Nos. 5362/2022, 5363/2022 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K, Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate V/s Dabur India Limited SIDCO Industrial Complex Bari Brahmana, Jammu ….Respondent(s) Through :- None Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE

ORDER 16.11.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.