Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Sun Pharma Laboratories LTD Sidco Igc Samba J And K

CEA/400/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006143202219 December 2022Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the Court on 23rd May 2022, with CEA No. 10 of 2020 being the leading case. Since no new grounds were presented by the appellant, the Court found that the matter was squarely covered by the prior decision. The reasoning was based on the principle of judicial precedent, where similar matters, without new arguments or facts, should be decided consistently with previous rulings. The Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. No specific issues were expressly left undecided.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal against M/S Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. (respondent). The appeal was stated to be similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh vide a judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022, where CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court found no new grounds were available to the appellant. Consequently, the matter was considered squarely covered by the prior decision.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment and order of this Court dated 23rd May 2022 in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals? The appellant contended that the appeal raises no new grounds and is identical to previous matters decided by the Court. The appellant relied on the principle that if a matter is squarely covered by a previous decision, it need not be reconsidered. The respondent did not present any arguments as recorded in the judgment. The revenue's argument was implicitly that the appeal should be dismissed on the same terms as the prior judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 400/2022 CM No. 7392/2022 CM No. 7393/2022 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate V/s M/S Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. SIDCO IGC Samba J and K ….Respondent(s) Through :- Coram: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE REJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE

ORDER 19.12.2022

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

(Rajesh Sekhri) J

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.