Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Kashmir Agro And Chemicals Sicop Industrial Area Kathua J And K
Held
The Court held that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the Court on May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. Since no new grounds were available to the appellant, the matter was squarely covered by the prior decision. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the previous judgment. The ratio decidendi is that appeals raising identical issues and grounds as those already decided by the Court, without presenting any new arguments or facts, are bound to be dismissed in line with the previous ruling. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal.
Facts
The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal against M/S Kashmir Agro and Chemicals SICOP Industrial Area Kathua (respondent). The appeal was stated to be similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court vide a judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, where CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case. The appellant's counsel was heard. The Court noted that no new grounds were available to the appellant, and the matter was squarely covered by the prior decision.
Key Issues
1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment and order of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that the present appeal raises identical grounds. Arguments: Petitioner/Appellant: The appellant argued that the present appeal is identical to previous appeals decided by the Court and that no new grounds are being raised. Therefore, the outcome should be consistent with the prior ruling. Respondent: The respondent did not present any arguments as recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 27.12.2022
This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.
Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.
(Rajesh Sekhri) Ju
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.