Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Jsb Aluminium Sidco Industrial Growth Centre Samba J And K
Held
The Court held that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the Court on May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals. Since no new grounds were available to the appellant, the matter was considered squarely covered by the prior decision. The Court found no reason to deviate from its previous ruling. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The ratio decidendi is that appeals raising identical issues and grounds as previously decided by the Court, without presenting new arguments or facts, will be dismissed following the established precedent.
Facts
The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K, Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal against an order concerning M/s JSB Aluminium SIDCO Industrial Growth Centre Samba (respondent). The appeal was heard by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu. The appellant's counsel appeared, while the respondent remained unrepresented. The Court noted that this appeal was identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the Court on May 23, 2022, with CEA No. 10 of 2020 being the leading case. The Court found no new grounds presented by the appellant that were not covered by the prior decision.
Key Issues
1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals? The appellant argued that the present appeal raises no new grounds and is squarely covered by the precedent set in CEA No. 10 of 2020. The appellant relied on this prior judgment as dispositive of the current matter. The respondent did not present any arguments as they were unrepresented.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 30.01.2023
This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.
Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.
Jammu: 30.01.2023 Raj Kumar
(M
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.