Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. Emcure Pharmaceuticals LTD Sidco Industrial Complex Bari Brahmana J And K

CEA/445/2022HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006273202130 January 2023Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by its previous judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The Court found that no new grounds were available to the appellant, the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the prior decision. The ratio decidendi is that appeals presenting identical facts and legal issues, without new grounds, will be decided in line with established precedents of the same court. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal against Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. J&K (respondent). The appeal was considered by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu. The Court noted that this appeal was identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the Court in a judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, where CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court found no new grounds were available to the appellant. The matter was deemed to be squarely covered by the previous decision.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment and order of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that no new grounds are available to the appellant. Contentions: Petitioner/Appellant (Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise): Argued that the appeal is identical to previous matters decided by the Court and that no new grounds have been presented. Relied on the precedent set by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020. Respondent (Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd.): No arguments are recorded for the respondent in the provided judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 445/2022 CM No. 7869/2022 CM No. 7870/2022 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate V/s Emcure Pharmaceuticals LTD J and K ….Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Gautam Chugh, Advocate with Mr. R. S. Parihar, Advocate. Coram: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

ORDER 30.01.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.