Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Jammu vs. Hitachi Home And Life Solutions LTD Canal Road Bari Brahmna Jammu

CEA/6/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006039202230 January 2023Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by its previous judgment dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals. The Court found that no new grounds were available to the appellant in the current appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the aforementioned prior judgment. The ratio decidendi is that if an appeal presents identical issues and no new grounds, it will be decided in line with previous binding precedents of the same court. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal.

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K, Jammu, against Hitachi Home and Life Solutions Ltd. The appeal concerns an issue that is stated to be similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. The leading case for these prior decisions was CEA No. 10 of 2020, decided on May 23, 2022. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court noted that no new grounds were presented by the appellant. The respondent was not represented.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals, thereby warranting dismissal on similar terms. Arguments: Petitioner/Appellant (Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K, Jammu): Argued that the present appeal involves issues identical to those decided in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals. Therefore, the appeal should be dismissed on the same grounds and reasoning as the prior judgment. Respondent (Hitachi Home and Life Solutions Ltd.): No arguments were recorded for the respondent as they were not represented before the Court.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No.6/2023 CM No. 51/2023 CM No. 52/2023 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K, Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s Hitachi Home and Life Solutions Ltd. ….Respondent(s) Through :- None. Coram: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

ORDER 30.01.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

Jammu: 30.01.2023 Raj Kumar

(Moksha Khajuria Kazm

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.