Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Jsb Aluminium Sidco Industrial Growth Centre Samba J And K

CEA/8/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006319202130 January 2023Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals. The reasoning was that the appellant's counsel conceded that no new grounds were available, indicating the matter was identical to the previously decided cases. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the prior judgment. The ratio decidendi is that appeals with identical facts and no new grounds are bound by previous High Court decisions on similar matters. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K, Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu. The appeal was against M/s JSB Aluminium SIDCO Industrial Growth Centre Samba (respondent). The judgment notes that this appeal is similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the Court. The leading case among those was CEA No. 10 of 2020, decided on May 23, 2022. The Court heard the counsel for the appellant.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the previous judgment of this Court dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals? The appellant argued that no new grounds were available to them, implying they conceded that the matter was indeed covered. The respondent did not appear, and therefore, no arguments were recorded on their behalf.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No.8/2023 CM No. 60/2023 CM No. 61/2023 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K, Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s M/s JSB Aluminium SIDCO Industrial Growth Centre Samba ….Respondent(s) Through :- None. Coram: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

ORDER 30.01.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

Jammu: 30.01.2023 Raj Kumar

(M

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.