Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. Hitachi Home And Life Solutions INDIA LTD Bari Brahmana Jammu J And K

CEA/2/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006035202230 January 2023Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING),HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court in its judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals. Since no new grounds were presented by the appellant, the matter was squarely covered by the prior decision. The reasoning is that the appeal does not introduce any novel legal or factual arguments that would warrant a different outcome. The ratio decidendi is that appeals raising identical issues and grounds, without new arguments, will be decided in line with previous judgments on the same subject matter. The Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the earlier judgment.

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K, Jammu, against Hitachi Home and Life, Bari Brahmana, Jammu. The appeal concerns an issue previously decided by the High Court in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals on May 23, 2022. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court noted that no new grounds were presented. The respondent did not appear. The specific tax period and amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal raises any new grounds not covered by the High Court's previous judgment in CEA No. 10 of 2020 and connected appeals dated May 23, 2022? Petitioner/Appellant's Argument: The appellant argued that the matter should be considered on its merits. However, the Court noted that the appellant's counsel was heard and that no new grounds were available. The appellant relied on the principle that each appeal should be considered, but the Court found the present appeal to be identical to previous ones. Respondent's Argument: No arguments were recorded for the respondent as they did not appear.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 2/2023 CM No. 29/2023 CM No. 30/2023 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate V/s Hitachi Home and Life Bari Brahmana Jammu ….Respondent(s) Through :- None. Coram: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

ORDER 30.01.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.