Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Jsb Aluminium Sidco Industrial Growth Centre Samba J And K

CEA/67/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006323202108 May 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by the Court's previous judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. Since no new grounds were presented by the appellant, the Court found no reason to deviate from its prior decision. The ratio decidendi is that appeals presenting identical facts and legal issues as those already decided by the Court will be disposed of on the same terms and conditions as the precedent judgment. The Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the prior judgment.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal against M/s JSB Aluminium (respondent). The appeal was identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh vide judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, where CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case. The appellant's counsel was heard. The Court noted that no new grounds were available to the appellant and the matter was squarely covered by the prior decision.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, as argued by the appellant's counsel. Contentions: Petitioner/Appellant: Argued that the present appeal is similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the Court, and no new grounds are available. Relied on the Court's previous judgment in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. Revenue/State: No arguments were recorded for the respondent.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No.67/2023 CM Nos.2629/2023 & 2630/2023 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s M/s JSB Aluminium ….Respondent(s) Through :- None. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE

ORDER 08.05.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

Jammu: 08.05.2023 Surinder

(Puneet Gupta) Judge

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.