Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Cadila Pharmaceuticals LTD Igc Samba J And K

CEA/77/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006644202215 May 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by the previous judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The reasoning was based on the appellant's counsel being heard and the observation that no new grounds were available to the appellant. The ratio decidendi is that if an appeal presents no new grounds and is identical to previously decided matters, it should be dismissed on the same terms as those prior decisions. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the cited judgment. No issues were expressly left undecided.

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K Jammu against M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The appeal concerns an issue that is stated to be similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. The leading case for those previous decisions was CEA No. 10 of 2020, decided on May 23, 2022. The appellant's counsel was heard, and the Court noted that no new grounds were available to the appellant. Consequently, the present appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the earlier judgment.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that no new grounds are available to the appellant. Contentions: Petitioner/Appellant (Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K Jammu): Argued that the present appeal is identical to previous appeals decided by the Court and that no new grounds have been presented. Therefore, the appeal should be dismissed on the same terms as the prior decisions. Respondent (M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.): No arguments were recorded for the respondent.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 77/2023 CM No. 2735/2023 CM No. 2736/2023 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. ….Respondent(s) Through :- None. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE

ORDER 15.05.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals.

(Puneet Gup

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.