Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. M/S Jammu Pigments PVT LTD Kathua J And K

CEA/168/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006127202329 November 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the Court in its judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. Since no new grounds were available to the appellant, the matter was squarely covered by the prior decision. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the aforementioned judgment. The ratio decidendi is that appeals raising identical issues with no new grounds are bound by previous High Court judgments on similar matters.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu (Appellant) filed an appeal against M/s Jammu Pigments Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent). The appeal concerns issues identical to several other Excise Appeals previously decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. The leading case among those was CEA No. 10 of 2020, decided on May 23, 2022. The present appeal was filed on November 29, 2023. The Court heard the counsel for the parties and noted that no new grounds were presented by the appellant, indicating the matter was fully covered by the prior judgment.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that the present appeal raises identical issues and no new grounds are available to the appellant? Contentions: Petitioner/Appellant: Argued that the appeal is identical to previous ones decided by the Court and that no new grounds have been presented, thus it should be dismissed on the same terms. Revenue/State: No arguments recorded for the respondent.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No. 168/2023 CM No. 7049/2023 CM No. 7050/2023 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K Jammu ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. V/s M/s Jammu Pigments Pvt. Ltd., Logate More, Kathua Jammu & Kashmir ….Respondent(s) Through :- - Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE

ORDER 29.11.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 wherein CEA No.10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd May 2022 passed in CEA No.10/2020 and connected appeals.

Jammu: 29.11.2023 *Raj Kumar*

(Rajesh Sekhri)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.