Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise J And K Jammu vs. Emcure Pharmaceuticals LTD Sidco Industrial Complex Bari Brahmana Jammu J And K

CEA/196/2023HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02006380202311 December 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals. The Court found that no new grounds were available to the appellant. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the aforementioned prior judgment. The ratio decidendi is that if an appeal presents no new grounds and is identical to previously decided matters, it will be dismissed based on the established precedent. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (J&K) Jammu, the appellant, filed this appeal against M/s Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the respondent. The appeal concerns an unspecified tax period and challenges an order passed by an unspecified authority. The amount in dispute is not stated. This appeal is stated to be similar and identical to several other Excise Appeals previously considered and decided by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh vide judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, where CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case. The appellant's counsel was heard.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated May 23, 2022, passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals, given that no new grounds are available to the appellant? The appellant argued that the matter is identical to previous appeals decided by this Court and that no new grounds have been presented. The respondent did not record any arguments in the judgment. The revenue's contention, implied by the filing of the appeal and the Court's reasoning, is that the appeal should be dismissed based on the precedent established in the cited judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CEA No.196/2023 CM Nos.7312/2023 & 7313/2023 Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (J&K) Jammu. ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Rohan Nanda, Advocate. V/s M/s Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Phase-II, Lane No.3, SIDCO Industrial Complex, Bari Brahmana, Jammu (J&K) ….Respondent(s) Through :- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE

ORDER 11.12.2023

1.

This appeal is similar and identical to the several other Excise Appeals which have been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd of May 2022 wherein CEA No. 10 of 2020 was the leading case.

2.

Having heard counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that as no new ground is available to the appellant, the matter stands squarely covered by the above decision.

3.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the judgment and order dated 23rd of May, 2022 passed in CEA No. 10/2020 and connected appeals

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.