Akhtar Ahmad War vs. Union Territory Of J And K (Finance) And Ors

WP(C)/2210/2025HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC01004687202509 September 2025Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the judgment passed in Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf’s case (supra) covers the case of the present petitioner as well. Consequently, the petition was disposed of with specific directions. The petitioner was directed to approach the competent authority for the registration of his GST Number within seven days from the date of the order. The competent authority was directed to restore the petitioner's GST Number immediately, subject to the completion of all requisite formalities. The petitioner was further directed to file returns and deposit taxes, along with penalty and interest, within a period of seven days. The order was made conditional on the petitioner fulfilling these obligations within the stipulated time; failure to do so would render the order inoperative. The court did not expressly leave any issue undecided.

Facts

The petitioner, Akhtar Ahmad War, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar. The petitioner sought relief concerning his GST registration. The petitioner's counsel argued that the case was covered by a previous judgment of the same court in WP(C) No. 1061/2024, titled "Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors.". The revenue or state was represented by Ms. Nowbahar Khan, Assisting Counsel. The court perused the material on record and considered the arguments presented.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment dated 26th July, 2024, passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 1061/2024, titled "Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors."? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner's case is entirely covered by the aforementioned judgment, implying that similar relief should be granted. Revenue/State's contention: No specific argument was recorded for the revenue or state in the judgment provided.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
S. No. 26 Suppl. Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 2210/2025 CM No. 5837/2025 Akhtar Ahmad War …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Imteyaz Rashid Bhat, Advocate Vs. UT of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nowbahar Khan, Assisting Counsel vice Mr. Mohsin S. Qadiri. Sr. AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE

O R D E R 09.09.2025

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, places reliance upon a judgement dated 26th July, 2024 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 1061/2024 titled “Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. and submits that the case of the petitioner is entirely covered by the aforesaid judgement.

2.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record, we are of the view that the judgement passed in Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf’s case (supra) covers the case of the present petitioner as well. This petition, is accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for registration of his GST Number w

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.