Mohammad Ramzan Ganai vs. Union Territory Of J And K And Ors. (State Taxes Department)
Held
The Court held that the judgment passed in Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf’s case (supra) covers the case of the present petitioner as well. The Court's reasoning was based on the petitioner's counsel placing reliance on the prior judgment and the Court's own perusal of the material and finding that the prior judgment indeed covered the present case. The operative directions issued were that the petition be disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for registration of his GST Number within ten days. The competent authority is directed to consider the restoration of the petitioner's GST Number, subject to completion of all requisite formalities, in light of the order passed in Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf v. Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Others. The competent authority is to pass a consideration order within four weeks from the date the petitioner furnishes a certified copy of this order.
Facts
The petitioner, Mohammad Ramzan Ganai, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar. The petitioner sought relief concerning his GST registration. The petitioner's counsel argued that the case was covered by a previous judgment of the same court in WP(C) No. 1061/2024, titled 'Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors.'. The court considered the material on record and the arguments presented by the petitioner's counsel.
Key Issues
1. Whether the present case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment dated 26th July, 2024, passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 1061/2024 titled 'Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors.'? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner contended that his case is entirely covered by the aforementioned judgment of this Court, implying that the same legal principles and relief granted in that case should apply to him. Revenue/State's Argument: The judgment does not record any specific arguments presented by the respondents (UT of J&K and Ors.).
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R 13.10.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, places reliance upon a judgement dated 26th July, 2024 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 1061/2024 titled “Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. and submits that the case of the petitioner is entirely covered by the aforesaid judgement.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record, we are of the view that the judgement passed in Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf’s case (supra) covers the case of the present petitioner as well. This petition, is accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for registration of his GST Number within a period of ten days from today. The competent authority shall s
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.