National Engineering Industries vs. Commissioner Of Central Excise Andser Tax

EXCIA/32/2018HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC02040233201805 April 20181 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court noted the appellant's submission that the contention of limitation was raised before the Tribunal but not considered. The Court held that it would be open for the appellant to file an appropriate application for rectification or review before the Tribunal. Following such an application and the Tribunal's decision thereon, the appellant would be at liberty to challenge the Tribunal's order as well as the order passed in the rectification application. The appeal before the High Court was disposed of on this basis, without deciding the merits of the limitation issue.

Facts

The appellant, National Engineering Industries, through its Authorized Signatory, filed a Central/Excise Appeal No. 32/2018 before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur. The appeal was against the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Jaipur-I (now Commissioner of GST). The appellant contended that a point of limitation was raised before the Tribunal but was not considered. The appellant sought to challenge the order passed by the Tribunal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal erred in not considering the contention of limitation raised by the appellant? (Question of law) Contentions: Appellant: Argued that the issue of limitation was raised before the Tribunal but was not adjudicated upon. They sought a direction for the Tribunal to consider this point. Revenue: No specific arguments recorded for the respondent in the provided text.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Central/excise Appeal No. 32/2018 National Engineering Industries, Through Its Authorized Signatory Shri Suresh Agrawal, Khatipura Road, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus Commissioner Of Central Excise And Service Tax, Jaipur-I, Ncrb Building Statue Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Presently Renamed As Commissioner Of Gst) ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sunil Nath with Mr. Archit Bohra For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS

Order 05/04/2018 Counsel for the appellant states that the contention of limitation was raised before the Tribunal but the same was not considered. It will be open for appellant to file appropriate application of rectification or review before the Tribunal. Thereafter, the appellant will be at liberty to challenge this order as well as order passed in rectification application.

The appeal stands disposed of. (VIJAY KUMAR VYAS),J (K.S.JHAVERI),J A.Sharma/85

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.