M/S Jaipur Metacast PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Anr
Held
The Court held that the earlier writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies, and not for making representations. Since the petitioner failed to pursue other remedies, the present writ petition is not maintainable. The Court dismissed the writ petition on the grounds of maintainability. However, the liberty granted in the earlier order to pursue alternative remedies would remain. The Court also granted the petitioner liberty to make an application for condonation of delay while pursuing alternative remedies, referencing Sections 5 and 14 of the Indian Limitation Act.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Jaipur Metacast Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court. A preliminary objection was raised by the respondents regarding the maintainability of the petition. The respondents pointed out that the petitioner had previously filed Writ Petition No. 4560/2012, which was withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies. The respondents argued that the petitioner had failed to pursue those other remedies and had instead filed the current writ petition, making it not maintainable. The petitioner contended that the earlier withdrawal was with liberty to make representations and that a representation had been made, thus the current writ petition should be considered maintainable.
Key Issues
1. Whether the present writ petition is maintainable, considering a previous writ petition filed by the petitioner was withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies? (Question of law) Petitioner's arguments: The petitioner argued that the earlier writ petition was withdrawn with liberty to make representations, and since a representation was made, the current writ petition is maintainable and a direction should be issued to the department to decide it. Respondents' arguments: The respondents argued that the earlier writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies, not for making representations. As the petitioner failed to pursue other remedies, the current writ petition is not maintainable.
Sections Cited
Section 5, Section 14
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Order 17/05/2018 A preliminary objection to maintainability of the writ petition has been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is stated that earlier also a Writ Petition No.4560/2012 was filed by the petitioner. It was then withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies. The petitioner has failed to take other remedies and preferred this writ petition again thus, is not maintainable in the light of the earlier order dated 2.7.2012.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the earlier writ petition was
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.