Namita Chaudhary vs. Commissioner And Ors

CW/13003/2017HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC02056406201726 February 2019Bench: ALOK SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that permission should be granted for the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning provided is that the counsel for the petitioner explicitly sought permission to withdraw. Consequently, the Court granted the permission as sought. The operative direction was to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. No other issues were decided on merits, and no specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were discussed in relation to the merits of the case.

Facts

The petitioner, Namita Chaudhary, a Superintendent in Central Excise and Service Tax, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court. The petition was directed against the Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax, Audit Commissionerate, Jaipur, and other authorities. The specific order or action under challenge and the tax period(s) are not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the writ petition and the subsequent request by the petitioner to withdraw it.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The respondents' arguments, if any, are not recorded in the judgment. The Court had to decide whether to allow the withdrawal of the petition.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13003/2017 Namita Chaudhary W/o Shri Ashok Kajla, Aged 53 years, Superintendent,

Central

Excise

And Service

Tax Commissionerate, Presently Posted As Superitendent, Cbec, Ajmer, R/o 2/659 Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus

1.

The Commissioner, Central Excise And Service Tax, Audit Commissionerate, Jaipur.

2.

The Chief Commissioner, Central Excise Jaipur Zone, Statue Circle, Jaipur

3.

The Member Personal And Vigilance Central Board Of Excise And Customs Gst, North Block Parliament, New Delhi

4.

The Additional Commissioner, Central Excise And Service Tax, Audit Commissionerate, Jaipur.

5.

The Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise And Service Tax, Audit Commissionerate, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Lokendra Singh. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA Order 26/02/2019 Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission as sought is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for. (ALOK SHARMA),J Karan/128

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.