Manmeet Kaur & Ors vs. Arvind Malik

RFA/934/2019HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01004090201923 October 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr.J.K.Bhola, Mr.Kshitiz Aggarwal and Mr.Vishal Kr., AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr.Vishal Khattar, Advocate with respondent in person
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court decided to dispose of the appeal based on the settlement reached between the parties. The appellants agreed to pay mesne profits at the rate of ₹95,000 per month from July 1, 2018, until they vacate the premises. Any amounts already paid by the appellants at a rate of ₹60,000 per month after July 1, 2018, were to be given due credit. The arrears were to be cleared by March 31, 2020. If the arrears were not cleared by this date, the respondent would be entitled to the decretal amount as per the impugned judgment. Electricity and water charges were to be paid as per actuals. An undertaking to this effect was to be filed by November 10, 2019. The appeal and pending applications were disposed of in terms of this order. The Court also directed that any GST payment certificates retained by the respondent be handed over to the appellant.

Facts

This is an appeal against a judgment dated July 3, 2019, passed by the Additional District Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, which decreed a suit for possession and mesne profits. The original decree calculated mesne profits at ₹5,000 per day from July 1, 2018. The appellants, represented by Mr. J.K. Bhola, sought to settle the matter amicably. They proposed to vacate the premises by March 31, 2020, and hand over vacant possession to the respondent, Mr. Arvind Malik. Regarding damages, the appellants offered to pay ₹95,000 per month instead of the daily rate.

Key Issues

1. Whether the mesne profits, as decreed by the lower court at ₹5,000 per day, should be modified based on the parties' settlement. Petitioner's arguments: The appellants are inclined to settle the matter amicably. They propose to vacate the premises by March 31, 2020, and hand over vacant possession. They also propose to pay mesne profits at a revised rate of ₹95,000 per month. Respondent's arguments: The respondent, present in person and represented by counsel, appears to have agreed to the settlement terms proposed by the appellants, as the court's order reflects an agreement between the parties.

Sections Cited

None

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 934/2019 MANMEET KAUR & ORS ..... Appellant Through : Mr.J.K.Bhola, Mr.Kshitiz Aggarwal and Mr.Vishal Kr., Advocates versus ARVIND MALIK ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Vishal Khattar, Advocate with respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

O R D E R %

23.10.

2019 CAV 1069/2019 Counsel as above appears for the respondent/caveator. The caveat is discharged. CM APPL.No.46729/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RFA 934/2019 & CM APPL.No.46728/2019

This appeal is against the judgment dated 03.07.2019 passed in civil suit No.(Old)163/18 (New)677/18 by learned Additional District Judge, Patiala House courts, New Delhi wherein suit for possession and mesne profits have been decreed. The mesne profits are calculated @ 5,000/- per day w.e.f. 01.07.2018. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits the appellants are inclined to settle the matter amicably and they would vacate the premises on or before 31.03.2020 and would hand over its vacant and peaceful possession to th

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.