Ram Prakash Pandey vs. The State Of Assam

Bail Appln./949/2018HC GauhatiGSTCNR GAHC01009676201816 May 2018Bench: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that further detention of the accused was not warranted. The reasoning was based on the verification of the seized documents with the Assistant Commissioner of Taxes, which confirmed the GST number as proper. Additionally, the FIR itself indicated that the alleged activity had been ongoing for three to four months, leading the Court to believe that the documents produced by the accused might not be entirely false. Consequently, the Court allowed the bail application. The operative direction was for the accused to be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000.00 with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati, in connection with the case.

Facts

The petitioner, Ram Prakash Pandey, sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with Gorchuk P.S. Case No. 220/2018, registered under Sections 420, 406, 468, 379, and 34 of the IPC. The case involved a search of a truck where materials were suspected to be illegal. Documents seized were verified with the Assistant Commissioner of Taxes, and the GST number was found to be proper. The FIR indicated the alleged activity had been ongoing for three to four months, suggesting the documents produced by the accused might not be entirely false. The Court perused the case diary and annexed documents.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in Gorchuk P.S. Case No. 220/2018, registered under Sections 420/406/468/379/34 of IPC? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued for release on bail, implying that further detention was not warranted given the circumstances. The petitioner's counsel relied on the verification of the GST number and the address, suggesting the documents were not entirely false. Revenue/State's Contention: The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, did not explicitly present arguments against bail in the judgment. However, the police had registered a case under various sections of the IPC, indicating suspicion of offenses.

Sections Cited

Section 439 Cr.P.C.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010096762018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln. 949/2018 1:RAM PRAKASH PANDEY S/O LT. JOY NARAYAN PANDEY R/O LOTUS COMPLEX, 2ND FLOOR, BEHARBARI, NEAR HOCKEY STADIUM, P.S. BASISTHA GUWAHATI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS 1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A CHAUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN

ORDER Date : 17-05-2018 Heard Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.

This is an application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner namely, Sri Ram Prakash Pandey has prayed for release on bail in connection with Gorchuk

P.S.

Case

No.

220/2018

under Sections

Page No.# 2/2 420/406/468/379/34 of IPC. Perused the case diary and the documents so annexed. It appears the police conducted search on a truck and after examining the documents and s

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.