Eris Lifesciences LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And 2 Ors.

WP(C)/7808/2018HC GauhatiGSTCNR GAHC01022370201809 June 2020Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the writ petitions. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file the petitions afresh, if advised, to challenge the vires of Section 174(2) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The Court noted that the vires of this provision had not been assailed in the present writ petitions. Consequently, the writ petitions were dismissed on withdrawal, with the aforementioned liberty granted to the petitioner. No decision was made on the merits of the original challenge, as the petitions were withdrawn.

Facts

The petitioners, Eris Lifesciences Ltd. and Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd., filed writ petitions before the Gauhati High Court. The petitions challenged certain actions or orders related to Goods and Services Tax (GST). The specific tax periods, amounts in dispute, and the authorities who passed the impugned orders are not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The procedural history indicates that the matters were listed for hearing before the High Court.

Key Issues

1. Whether Section 174(2) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, is ultra vires? (This issue was not explicitly raised in the original petitions but was sought to be introduced by the petitioner during the hearing). Petitioner's Contention: The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file them afresh. The primary reason for this request was to challenge the vires of Section 174(2) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, a ground not assailed in the current petitions. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments or contentions made by the respondents (Union of India and others, Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax, State of Assam) regarding the merits of the case or the petitioner's request. The learned ASGI appeared for the respondents.

Sections Cited

Section 174(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

WP(C) 7808/2018
WP(C) 7812/2018

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010223702018

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C) 7808/2018 1:ERIS LIFESCIENCES LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS UNIT AT PLOT NO. 30-31, BRAHMAPUTRA INDUSTRIAL PARK, VILL- SILA, MOUZA- SENDURI GHOPA, AMINGAON, NORTH GUWAHATI, DIST. KAMRUP - 781031, ASSAM THROUGH SRI ANIL KUMAR SINGH SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER, AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PETITIONER COMPANY.

VERSUS 1:UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE SECRETARY , DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, AND DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX SETHI TRUST BUILDING

G.S. ROAD

BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- ASSAM PIN- 781005. 3:STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. R BORAH

Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GST Linked Case : WP(C) 7812/2018 1:SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.