The Union Of INDIA And Anr. vs. M/S Purbanchal Builders

Arb.A./7/2022HC GauhatiGSTCNR GAHC01005759202231 May 2022Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that the appeal had become infructuous. This finding was based on the admitted position presented by both the appellants and the respondent. The respondent's counsel stated that the GST amount of Rs. 1,19,310/- was deducted before the petition was filed, which led to the impugned order dated 3.5.2021. The appellants' counsel agreed with this factual submission and acknowledged that the matter had indeed become infructuous. Consequently, the Court found that the impugned order itself had become infructuous due to this prior deduction. The appeal was therefore disposed of on this basis, without delving into the merits of the original dispute.

Facts

This appeal was filed by the Union of India and the Garrison Engineer, Guwahati, Military Engineering Services, against an order dated 3.5.2021. The respondent, M/s Purbanchal Builders, submitted that the appeal had become infructuous. This was because a sum of Rs. 1,19,310/- towards GST had been deducted before the petition leading to the impugned order was filed. The appellants' counsel agreed with this submission and admitted that the matter had become infructuous. The impugned order itself had become infructuous due to the prior deduction of the GST amount.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal has become infructuous due to the deduction of GST amount prior to the filing of the petition leading to the impugned order. Contentions: Petitioner/Appellant (Union of India and Garrison Engineer): Did not argue on merits, but agreed with the respondent's submission that the appeal had become infructuous. Respondent (M/s Purbanchal Builders): Argued that the appeal had become infructuous because the GST amount of Rs. 1,19,310/- was deducted before the petition was filed, rendering the impugned order moot.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010057592022

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Arb.A./7/2022 THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE GARRISON ENGINEER, GUWAHATI, MILITARY ENGINEERING SERVICES, PO SATGAON, DISTKAMRUP M ASSAM ,781027, ASSAM 2: GARRISON ENGINEER GUWAHATI MILITARY ENGINEERING SERVICES PO SATGAON, DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 781027, ASSAM VERSUS M/S PURBANCHAL BUILDERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE HAVING ITS OFFICE AT WD BUILDING, BHARALUMUKH, GUWAHATI 09, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS SHIV KUMAR ADWANI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A DHAR

B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA

01-06-2022 Heard Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. F. Faridi, learned counsel for the sole respondent.

Page No.# 2/2 Mr. Faridi, learned counsel for the sole respondent has submitted that this appeal has become infructuous in view of deduction of GST of Rs.1,19,310/- befor

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.