Commissioner,Central Excise And Service Tax vs. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages PVT LTD

I.A.(Civil)/3635/2022HC GauhatiGSTCNR GAHC01025100202214 December 2022Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the applicant had shown sufficient cause for the condonation of the 5-day delay in preferring the connected Central Excise Appeal. The reasoning was based on the explanation rendered in the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court found the explanation satisfactory. Consequently, the delay was condoned, and the application was allowed. The Court directed that the connected Central Excise Appeal be registered, numbered, and listed for admission on January 24, 2023. No issues were expressly left undecided.

Facts

This matter concerns an application for condonation of delay filed by the Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax (the applicant/revenue) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The applicant sought condonation of a 5-day delay in preferring a connected Central Excise Appeal against Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt Ltd (the respondent). The application was heard by the Gauhati High Court. The applicant's counsel presented the explanation for the delay, and the respondent's counsel was also heard. The Court considered the explanation provided in the application.

Key Issues

1. Whether sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for condoning the delay of 5 days in preferring the connected Central Excise Appeal, as per Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Arguments: Petitioner (Revenue): The petitioner argued that there was a delay of 5 days in filing the appeal and sought condonation by providing an explanation. They relied on the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which allows for condonation of delay if sufficient cause is shown. Respondent: The respondent's counsel was heard, but no specific arguments against the condonation of delay were recorded in the judgment. The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the respondent against the application.

Sections Cited

Section 5

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010251002022

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3635/2022 COMMISSIONER,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX MILAN NAGAR, LANE F, CR BUILDING,DIBRUGARH, 786003 VERSUS HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES PVT LTD A.T ROAD, RRL,JORHAT,ASSAM, 785001 Advocate for the Petitioner : SC, GST Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : C. Ex. Appeal 178/2019 (Filing Number) COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX VERSUS HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES PVT LTD ------------

Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for : Advocate for : appearing for HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES PVT LTD Linked Case : C.Ex.App./3/2019 COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX MILAN NAGAR LANE F CR BUILDING DIBRUGARH-786003 VERSUS HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES PVT LTD AT ROAD RRL JORHAT ASSAM 785001 ------------ Advocate for : ASSTT.S.G.I. Advocate for : MR. K BAISHYA appearing for HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES PVT LTD

BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.