M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, Cuttack
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Middlex, Puri, challenged a show cause notice dated November 6, 2024, and the subsequent order dated December 17, 2024, passed by the Commissioner of State Tax, Cuttack, which cancelled their GST registration. The petitioner expressed willingness to pay all outstanding taxes, interest, late fees, penalties, and other dues along with their returns. They relied on a previous order by a coordinate bench in W.P.(C) No. 30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others) which condoned delay in invoking a rule and directed consideration of revocation subject to deposit of dues. The department's counsel conceded that if the petitioner fulfilled their undertaking, the authority would act accordingly.
Held
The Court held that in view of the conceded position by the revenue and the petitioner's undertaking to pay all outstanding dues, the writ petition could be disposed of. The petitioner was directed to make the payments within two weeks. Upon such payment, the opposite party (Commissioner of State Tax) was directed to consider the application for revocation of the cancellation of the registration certificate within a period not later than six weeks from the date of the order. The Court effectively followed the precedent set by the coordinate bench, allowing for the potential revival of the petitioner's GST registration subject to their compliance with financial obligations.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner's delay in complying with the requirements for revocation of GST registration cancellation should be condoned, considering their undertaking to pay all dues, as per the principle laid down in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner argued that their situation is covered by the coordinate bench's order, which condoned delay and directed consideration of revocation upon deposit of dues. They are ready to pay all taxes, interest, late fees, and penalties. Revenue's Argument: The Additional Standing Counsel for the department, after reviewing the cited order, conceded that if the petitioner complies with the undertaking and deposits the amounts, the concerned authority shall take necessary action.
Sections Cited
Rule 23
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 14.10.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
Mr.Bibhudendra Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits that the show cause notice dated 6th November, 2024 followed by order dated 17th December 2024 cancelling the registration certificate of the petitioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is under challenge. He submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty
and any other sum required to be paid along with the return. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Be
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.